To have a one world religion in preparation for the coming of Antichrist Satan needs a one world bible all religions can associate with, us or approve. One which shows Jesus is no different to the founders of other religions so that all can relate to Jesus because He is like the founder of their religion. This would allow Christians and other religions to worship together with little or no conflict between their beliefs. The may believe slightly different things but there would be little to cause division in these areas.
Satan has done this now with modern Bibles so th at even Satanists can use it as well as cults like Jehovah’s witnesses who even are on the editorial board of some modern versions.
So how did the Bible become to be so corrupted so that any religion can use it or associate their leaders as being like Jesus.
Satan stared this process in the 1600’s with the ‘age of enlightenment’ and Cessationism.
In the Middle Ages The Bible ruled and science was subservient to what The Bible said about it. Science was not developed to the extent that its concepts were able to question what The Bible taught about the natural order of things.
Today science is king and The Bible is made to submit to it.
The change in attitudes towards what The Bible said was because of the new scientific discoveries and lack of evidence of places mentioned in The Bible which seemed to contradict The Bible resulting in negative attitudes towards it in the 'Age of Enlightenment' period which meant that man felt they had to correct what The Bible said with what they reasoned it should say and ignored what it said. After all The Bible had been disproved by science and archeology.
The trials of Galileo in 1610 and 1633 were really about attitudes that would be a part of the age of enlightenment and not actually the theories involved in the trial. If the attitudes Galileo had towards the old theories had been accepted then there would have been no trial. The attitudes were behind the fact the new theories were expressed and the rejection of these theories' meant these attitudes were also rejected. So, in a sense, the age of the enlightenment's embryo was possibly in the early 1600s and its full expression was later in the 18th Century.
It could be said that before the 'enlightenment' matured, science was aimed at expressing the Glories of God, revealing His Glory in the discoveries that were made, while the age of enlightenment was aimed at knowledge of things by man, giving man the glory for the discoveries made. The object of focus was turned from God to man and along with this faith in the things of God diminished amongst those who examined the things of science and who had declared The Bible was full of errors.
So firstly we will examine what the Age of Enlightenment was.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Enlightenment was a philosophical movement which dominated the world of ideas in Europe in the 18th century. The Enlightenment included a range of ideas centered on reason as the primary source of authority and legitimacy, and came to advance ideals such as liberty, progress, tolerance, fraternity, constitutional government and ending the abuses of the church and state. The Enlightenment was marked by increasing empiricism, scientific rigor, and reductionism, along with increased questioning of religious orthodoxy.
European politics, philosophy, science and communications were radically reoriented during the course of the “long 18th century” (1685-1815) as part of a movement referred to by its participants as the Age of Reason, or simply the Enlightenment. Enlightenment thinkers in Britain, in France and throughout Europe questioned traditional authority and embraced the notion that humanity could be improved through rational change. The Enlightenment produced numerous books, essays, inventions, scientific discoveries, laws, wars and revolutions. The American and French Revolutions were directly inspired by Enlightenment ideals and respectively marked the peak of its influence and the beginning of its decline. The Enlightenment ultimately gave way to 19th-century Romanticism.
In his essay "What Is Enlightenment?" (1784), the German philosopher Immanuel Kant summed up the era's motto in the following terms: "Dare to know! Have courage to use your own reason!"
Locke argued that human nature was mutable and that knowledge was gained through accumulated experience rather than by accessing some sort of outside truth. Newton’s calculus and optical theories provided the powerful Enlightenment metaphors for precisely measured change and illumination.
One historian’s summary of Voltaire’s “Philosophical Dictionary”: “a chaos of clear ideas.” Foremost among these was the notion that everything in the universe could be rationally demystified and catalogued.
It was also a time of religious (and anti-religious) innovation, as Christians sought to reposition their faith along rational lines and deists and materialists argued that the universe seemed to determine its own course without God’s intervention.
(My comments:) In the Middle ages God was behind everything so science had to obey The Bible. In the enlightenment, God was an impersonal player as there was no proof he existed because the supernatural was now absent from the established church because of Cessationism and so it became a battle of words between the church and science. If Pentecostalism and Charismatic churches had been around things may have been different.)
The church little or no evidence of a supernatural God while science had all the evidence it needed to prove it because all it theorised about, (at that stage), could be seen or proved by experiment. People embraced science and rejected Christian belief because it could not be proved and God did not appear to be real because He did not work through the church to prove His existence.
So a culture arose where it was allowable to doubt The Bible because what it said could not be proven at that time and not was backed up by science and archaeology and God did not appear to be real or relevant because He was not personally working miracles to prove who He was.
Let us just imagine that you are a theologian who believes The Bible is not correct because it does not align with what science is finding out about the world, especially evolution, which had been around 100 years or more before Darwin wrote his book. You believe the Bible is corrupted because of this and has not been copied (transmitted) correctly.
The church does not show there is a supernatural element to nature because of Cessationism so you become rational about things looking for natural explanations in all things.
As you are a scientist, history is very important so you look for historical Greek texts apparently much older than the ones used for the King James Bible and when two texts 1400 years old are discovered you embrace them because they appear to back up your criticism ot The Bible’s ‘inaccuracies’ and provide what appears to be a more accurate version of the Greek text..
You do not worry about doctrinal differences as you believe the doctrine in the King James is incorrect, being the result of later texts where errors were copied into it so that it does not accurately reflect doctrine according to you viewpoint.
So you promote the translation of this 'New, improved, earlier text' and ignore the arguments of those who follow the King James Bible.
Because you have other Greek texts apparently written earlier than the ones they had for the King James which you consider erroneous in some degree you also look at other religions to see what they were like when Christ was born as you assume what He did had to be like what they did s that is what you can find historically.
Because you believe your two Greek texts are correct as far as you are concerned no doctrine is altered by them. If any are any differences to what Jesus did then it is because of the erroneous texts used by the translators of the King James.
Because you do not believe in a supernatural events as none are evident in the church you remove as many of these as you can, such as the virgin birth. So these errors’ are removed from The Bible.
Because all world religions do not have God born as a man you reason Jesus must be a man so cannot be sinless. So he appears to sin in Matt 5:22 and John 7:8.
Because other founders of religions were deified you have no problem with Jesus being deified in heaven but not on earth.
You are not concerned about the miracles of Jesus or the gifts of The Spirit occurring today because of Cessationism in the churches. Besides they are not present in most religions
This means you do not need supernatural events to verify the Jesus you write about is the real one.
So you have a Jesus who was born a man, did good but was not perfect and died and became like an ascended master or God. But he was not god before he died.
The Bible translations derived from the Greek you make out of these two codices reflects all of these suppositions and the churches that use them also accept them.
So the church becomes more like the pagan religions used to evaluate Christianity and it no longer demonstrates The King of God because it no longer demonstrates The Kingdom of God's authority over demons and nature.
This suits Satan who has to corrupt Christianity and its holy book so that Jesus is like the founder of other world religions and the supernatural is really not a part of their worship or lifestyle. This he has to do to prepare for antichrist and so he can form the one world religion for Antichrist to be worshiped by.
Antichrist will be a normal man, like the founder of any other religion, and will be honoured like the founders of other religions are honoured. He will appear to be like Jesus but greater than Jesus because of the miracles he will perform.
Meanwhile the defenders of both Greek texts will fight to the death defending their text, believing the other side is deceived.
So a generation has grown up not knowing the doctrine of the King James Version and only know Bibles based on the new Greek. This means they will not see any doctrinal error in Bibles based on the new Greek and to them the King James will have the errors.
The stage is ready now for antichrist to appear as he has a whole generation now trained in the bible he has created for the ‘Christian’ church to use and has moulded it to be like other religions so it can be easily assimilated with them in his one world church.
Part B of Satan’s plan was the necessity to remove the ability of Christianity to do miracles and by this showing Jesus was no different to the founders of other religions. This is one reason they removed Mark 16:9-21so that there was no delegation from Jesus to do miracles.
This they did about the time the ‘Age of Enlightenment’ occurred and used a reaction to the spiritual excesses of the Catholic church to do this when the reformation started.
(From the Wiki article on Cessationism)
In Christianity, Cessationism is the doctrine that spiritual gifts such as speaking in tongues, prophecy and healing ceased with the original twelve apostles. This is generally opposed to continuationism, which teaches that the Holy Spirit may bestow the spiritual gifts on persons other than the original twelve apostles at any time.
Cessationists teach that their primary purpose was to authenticate the Apostles' message as being of divine origin and, therefore, authoritative (Hebrews 2:3-4). However, since the completion of the canon, the Church can test the veracity (or lack thereof) of any message claiming to represent God, against his written revelation which having now been completed, rendering any supernatural sign as unnecessary (2 Peter 1:19; see also 2 Timothy 3:16-17).
Cessationists believe that, given that the authority of the early church has been established and the New Testament is complete, Christians do not require charismatic gifts to guide them. As a result, Cessationists believe that the spiritual gifts ceased to operate with the passing of the last of the twelve apostles and are no longer in effect today.
Because the supernatural expression of the gifts is the proof of Jesus resurrecting and being Divine and Lord of All and the only expression of His Kingdom on earth then removing these things removes that which differentiates the Christian church from other religions making it no different to most of them.
Because of what Satan has done all religions will be equal when antichrist comes and those that do not agree with these’ modern versions of The Bible will be removed unless raptured before antichrist appears.
Modern theologians use historical methods to Judge Jesus and so cannot really see anything historically that makes Him Divine and so look to other religions to see what He should be like by looking at the religions of His time and arguing He should be like these and so modify The Bible to remove His divinity and all that would point to it so that He is like any other founder of a religion. To do this they rationalise about the proofs of His Divinity and prefer negatives reasonings about it than positive ones built on faith.
They ignore the warning in 2 Cor 10:5 to take everything captive to Jesus and not assume, imagine or reason things out without reference to The Bible. This means anything supernatural done by Jesus is not considered real or possible . This means they believe that miracles really no longer occur which means the main proof of Jesus is not accepted as being a real event. When asked why these occur they cannot explain but reason there will be something found that will explain them as being not supernatural.
So they do the following to show He wsa human and not divine at birth:
Imply Jesus had a normal birth
Sinned
Cannot be redeemer
Was not resurrected in a way different to the resurrection of others supposedly resurrected
They say we need to work at our salvation because the cross was ineffective for salvation. This was incorrect as the cross was about redemption as salvation has always been by faith. But they do not believe Jesus can redeem so replace redemption with salvation as the purpose of the Cross. They also believe salvation is not purely by faith so that we have to do works to be saved.
He was promoted by God (made divine) for His sacrifice and obedience.
As a result this makes Christianity like any other religion so all religions can use the new modern bibles as Jesus is like the founder of any other religion and can also fellowship together (which explains why ecumenicism is growing so we now have a one world bible for all religions that want to use part or whole of it (including the new age and Satanists) because they will find little in it to offend them. They just change the names of the Trinity in The Bible to match the names of their deities
Now to go into some detail in how they do some of these things.
They deny The Trinity because they do not believe Jesus is God so there cannot be a Trinity. They do this by removing 1 John 5:7 saying it was not in the early Bibles, but there is much evidence to show it was there and accepted by early Christians.
They remove Mark 16:9-21 and as a result remove a lot that makes Jesus Divine:
They remove the resurrection. They cannot historically prove it and as no other person has ever been resurrected the way Jesus was they assume Jesus could not have been.
They remove the authority delegated to us by Jesus over Satan and his works. No other religious founder has been able to cast out demons let alone authorise others to be able to do so and as they consider Jesus human He also could not do these things.
They remove the delegated authority to heal sickness which no other religious founder has or is able to give.
They remove the resurrection and the Ascension of Jesus as being special. No other religious founder has been ascended into heaven in the way Jesus was.
The fact He did miracles in His own ministry or raised the dead and removed demons is nothing special. After all Elijah and Elisha did those things.
They implied Jesus sinned in Matt 5:22 and John 7:8 so cannot be redeemer.
There are many verses dealing with these things and you will see this when you look at a modern bibles that show these are removed. You will usually find the margins saying what older versions have where the verses have been removed or adulterated.
They deny His virgin birth deliberately mistranslating 'virgin' as 'young woman' and declare Joseph and Mary are His parent and not God and Mary.
The Modern new testament are full of these changes and there are 8000+ changes made to the King James to remove the Divinity of Jesus so I mention only a few.
As you can see modern bibles are not based on faith but man's reasonings about it based on historical precedence and the assumptions of their theology.
God was never asked about the correct translation of His Bible and often a vote was taken to see which was considered the best translation of a verse which unfortunately does not mean it is the correct translation of a verse.
Why do they need Jesus to be human? So he is no different to the founders of other religions and so they can all be combined in a one world religion using one bible. They do not realise Satan is using them to prepare this for his antichrist so that they will soon be removed as the one world religion rulers and replaced by Satan.
The only way to show Jesus is superior is to show His Kingdom through casting out demons, healing the sick and raising the dead using the authority of His Name. But most churches do not do this believing it is not able to be done today or even applicable today.
Satan certainly has most churches and Christians really messed up and trained well.
This is why the three great revivals just before the tribulation occur to restore Jesus to how He should have been treated by showing He is superiors o the founders of other religions by what is done in His delegated authority. This show He is God able to delegate these things and that He also cause them to happen which other religious founders cannot do and so show He is different to them and God.
When Jesus was born, at that time amongst pagans there was a long history of men being born divine because their mother had sex with a god. There was also a history of men being made divine after death. So pagans could easily accept what was said about Jesus being divine at birth and or after death. This is why the gospel could spread so quickly among the pagans while the Jews, who did not have this history though Jesus a blasphemer.
But what made Jesus different to these other people?
Paul summed it up in 1 Cor 2:9
1Co 2:4 And my message and my preaching were not with persuasive words of human wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power,
1Co 2:5 in order that your faith might not be in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.
The demonstration of the authority of Jesus over nature, demons and sickness which none of these other 'divine' beings had and which none of the modern religious founders have. This shows Jesus was different and was really God and not just someone who had been said to be God.
This was a problem for those who believed He was not born of God but of a normal man and needed people to believe this so they could make Jesus out to be like the founder of every other religion. So whatever made Jesus divine was removed where possible from modern versions so it could be used as a one world Bible.
This means there is no spiritual power or authority in the modern Evangelical Churches that use new Bibles because it is not taught by these Bibles. This type of Christianity is really no different to other religions making it easy for antichrist to combine all religions into one.
So if you want to show Jesus is different then you need to demonstrate His Authority and power over Demons, illness and nature when He asks you to do this otherwise He is no different to Mohammed, Budda, Krishna or other cult or religious founders.
The final demotion of Jesus
In a new age magazine I just read (so I know the enemies plans) Jesus is said to be the highest ranking angel before He came to earth. This satisfies the verses in the new bibles that talk about his pre-existence and also satisfies religions that have angels and demons.
The divinity and virgin birth of Jesus having been removed they now declare there is no way He could have been divine before He came to earth and also that He was a high ranking angel, just like Satan!
A modern theologian is quoted to back this view point and it is to be noted that some in the Roman Catholic church believe this already as in an evening mass at the Vatican before one Easter one priest was praying to Lucifer, praising him and demoting Jesus to an inferior position. It was captured on video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcpVrtv2t-M
The text is as follows:
Published on 4 Jul 2014
Pope Francis and the Vatican has introduced the world to their god they been worshiping all along, Lucifer. According to Pope Francis and the Catholic Church, The Morning Star is the creator of the world and the father of Christ. He brought "light" to the human race.
This announced was made to the world April 27th, 2014 during a ceremony where Pope John Paul the 1st and Pope john Paul the 2nd.This declaration is unprecedented and should cause concern to the world. It's no coincidence that the first Jesuit Pope would make such a shocking statement. He has been overhauling the Vatican since he got in. So far he has said Athiest will enter heaven as long as they do good works. He also stated Jesus is just a man and prays to the father and he is a co-mediator with mother Mary between God and man.
This is the statement made during that Mass:
"His flame dawning his own son
May, I say to you O' lucifer who knows no setting
Christ is your son who came back from the dead
and shed his light to the human race
and is alive and reigns for ever and ever"
As it can be seen Lucifer is considered greater than Jesus. However could it be referring to God The Father as light giver? After all He is described as a flaming fire. Even so it states Jesus was created like Lucifer.
This passage fits the objective of making Jesus and Satan the same, that both are high ranking angels so that when Lucifer reigns he can say that Christian theologians will back up his claim to be equal t o Jesus having every right to rule like Jesus did.
This will also make it easier to relate to Christianity if Jesus and Lucifer are the same so that people that worship demons can also worship Jesus as He is just like a demon to them.
So having removed the divinity of Jesus and His virgin birth some modern theologians declare he is equal to Lucifer as He is just another angel like him.
Time will tell. All I know is I thank God we will not be here for that time which must occur after the rapture.
Is the God of modern Bibles a true God?
God is Love and is able to control all circumstances so that if the god of modern Bibles as the true God He would have been able to keep the true Bible text accurate forever and tell us what we needed to know to obey him. He also would have allowed no inaccuracies in His Bible.
The editor of modern Bibles believe their god was not able to preserve the true text of the Bible and that it has myths in it. If this is true then the god of the modern Bibles lied as he says he is love but did not love or care about us enough to preserve the text so we could obey him properly. This means he cannot be the true God because he lied or he cannot be the true God because he was not able to preserve the text.
This means he is not all powerful so cannot be the true God and that he also is not all-knowing or he would have known the need of gifts and miracles to make Christianity different to other religions.
So if he is not the true God he must be a lesser god, who is he? It can only be Satan.
God said He would preserve His word so we would know what He required of us.
Modern theologians say He has not done this.
So they have problems which are as follows:
They have a Textus Receptus text the basis of The King James they say is not correct and they have to correct to make it say what they believe God meant it to say.
They have no Bible that is 100% accurate to compare what they come up with as a correct translation. If they had one they would not need to alter the Textus Receptus (according to them) to make it correct.
As they do not know what errors are in it they cannot really use any part of it.
They have used texts that are 80% in agreement with the Textus Receptus. They should not have used these texts as they do not know what errors are in them because they say the Textus Receptus has errors and they use 80% of it and can only assume something will be in error as they do not have a 100% accurate Bible to compare theirs too.
So any translation they make may have more errors than the King James and the Textus Receptus so you cannot accept anything based on the Vaticanus or Siniaticus which means all modern bibles should be rejected along with the King James.
So according to them we really do not have a Bible you can trust unless you consider what they believe is the correct translation of it.
To do this they have to reject 1800 years of Christian traditional doctrine which was given by Jesus to the early church. So according to them the church got it wrong those 1800 years also because what He taught, as found in the Textus Receptus was not right. Or if they say it was incorrectly passed down how do they know what is correctly reported of what Jesus said does not have error in.
So they need to find a God they can trust, a Bible they can use and saviour they can believe and because they cannot use the Textus Receptus (King James) or trust God, its writer or traditional church doctrine as given to the church by Jesus.
It cannot be the Jesus of the King James Bible because He may be in error because we may not have what He actually said to know it was correct or may have been in error having given incorrect doctrine to the church.
It also cannot be the God that lied about preserving His Bible
Who is left?
Only the other god, Satan.
Not all are left out in all of them but mast are left out in all of them
The following list is excellent but it does not tell you why the changes were made. To understand this you need to examine the rationale behind the changes.
When the age of enlightenment came men started to examine the Bible scientifically and found there was little historical evidence of the things said about Jesus or for His Miracles. They could not find archaeology to back up the Biblical places or science in it that agreed with what was being discovered about science. So they believed the Bible needed to be corrected to match science and history and so they needed a standard and looked at the first century religions.
They also did not believe in miracles (they could not be scientifically proven) and thought the stories of Genesis were myths which meant they had to find other reasons for things like 'The Fall' and did not believe in the biblical flood.
In the first century there were people who had the same claims made about them as Jesus did. But they were all born of a union of a male or female and so the 'virgin birth' had to go which is why virgin in Is 7:14 is changed to 'young woman' even though it is incorrectly translated'.
If Jesus was not divine there was no Trinity so 1 Jn 5:7 had to go.
They felt they had to correct the Bible so it said what they believe God had originally sad in it.
They ignored the doctrines of what they assumed was the incorrect King James Bible and assumed the doctrines in their Bibles was correct. This is why it is no use arguing doctrine with them or Greek texts because they believe the Greek texts behind the King James are in error as are its doctrines and theirs are correct.
This means you have to how their source documents are not correct and that miracles still do occur to show Jesus is different to those in the first century who had things similar to them that had been ascribed to Jesus.
Now I will try to show how the changes made refer to the belief Jesus is not divine and was not God before the resurrection.
There are at least 17 entire verses omitted from the New Testament in such modern versions as the NIV, RSV, ESV, and the NASB. The NIV omits all 17 of these verses, while the RSV, ESV omit even more, and the NASB varies from one edition to the next, omitting all these verses in some editions and replacing some of them in others.
This shows they really do not know what should be in the Bible but are guessing according to evidence turning up about the verses.
All these seventeen whole verses are found in the ancient Old Latin Version which dates from around 157 A.D., and was in use through the 1500's.
The Syriac Peshita dates from roughly the same time and you will find most of these in it except for 1 Jn 5:7 which was removed because it was being used for a heresy.
Here is a list of these verses which are found in the Authorized King James Holy Bible, and in the ancient Old Latin Version, but are omitted in the modern versions based on the very different Westcott-Hort Greek text. The following verses are found in all, or most or some of the few remaining Old Latin manuscripts. There undoubtedly were hundreds if not thousands of such Old Latin Bibles in existence throughout the centuries, but today we have only a few remaining, partial copies.
Matthew 17:21 "Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by prayer and fasting."
Assuming Jesus is not divine then it is no use praying or fasting to Him. By leaving this in it assumes He is divine because He knows what is necessary to remove demons and control them.
Matthew 18:11 "For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost."
The purpose of Jesus is hidden as is a Divine title of His so that his purposes are no different to other people. It also removes the fact He is the only founder of a religion with a purpose for coming to earth which means He must have had preexistence before being born on earth to know He needed this purpose for coming here.
Matthew 23:14 "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation."
This criticizes the theologians of the days of Jesus and theologians must not be criticised so that their teachings ae not called into question. He is also judging them which only God can do
Mark 7:16 "If any man have ears to hear, let him hear."
If Jesus is a normal man then there is nothing special about His teaching. Leaving this in implies there is.
Mark 9:44-46 "Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched...into the fire that never shall be quenched: Where their worm dieth not, and the fire is not quenched."
Hell and demons are hidden in new Bibles, but then demons can be good as well and hell is not a place most religions believe in so they cannot have that in a one world Bible.
Mark 11:26 "But if ye do not forgive, neither will your Father which is in heaven forgive your trespasses."
If Jesus is not divine how can He know what The Father desires in us so this has to be removed or it may imply Jesus is divine. Besides so many Christians are in hell in spite of living a good Christian life but deliberately not forgiving someone.
Mark 15:28 "And the scripture was fulfilled, which saith, And he was numbered with the transgressors."
This is a prophesied thing of The Messiah and as they do not believe in prophecy because it is supernatural prophetic allusions are removed from modern Bible where possible.
Luke 9:55-56 "But he turned and rebuked them, AND SAID, YE KNOW NOT WHAT MANNER OF SPIRIT YE ARE OF. FOR THE SON OF MAN IS NOT COME TO DESTROY MEN'S LIVES, BUT TO SAVE THEM. And they went to another village." All the capital lettered words are missing from the NIV, NASB, RSV.
Here Jesus uses a divine title to state His work on earth, They believe salvation has to be worked at and Jesus can have no part in it if He is human so they alter a verse like this. He also refers to Satan indirectly which is a no no as it implies Satan is not a benevolent spirit which some religions and new agers believe.
Luke 17:36 "Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left."
This deals with the rapture which is a supernatural event and they do not believe in it
Luke 23:17 "For of necessity he must release one unto them at the feast."
If you can work out why this was left out please let me know.
John 5: 3b-4 "waiting for the moving of the water. For an angel went down at a certain season into the pool, and troubled the water: whosoever then first after the troubling of the water stepped in was made whole of whatsoever disease he had."
This is a supernatural thing so is removed.
Acts 8:37 "And Phillip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God."
Removing this verse allows anyone to be baptised in the Name of Jesus (to imply they are a follower of His) including Satan as there is no requirement to have Jesus as your Lord.
Acts 9:5-6 "And he said, Who art thou Lord? And THE LORD SAID, I am Jesus whom thou persecutest: IT IS HARD FOR THEE TO KICK AGAINST THE PRICKS. AND HE TREMBLING AND ASTONISHED SAID, LORD, WHAT WILT THOU HAVE ME TO DO? AND THE LORD SAID UNTO HIM, Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do." All the capital lettered words are missing in the NASB, NIV, RSV, but found in the Old Latin and the KJB.
Here the divinity of Jesus and His ascension into heaven is removed.
Acts 15:34 "Notwithstanding it pleased Silas to abide there still."
Acts 24:6-8 "Who also hath gone about to profane the temple: whom we took, AND WOULD HAVE JUDGED ACCORDING TO OUR LAW. BUT THE CHIEF CAPTAIN LYSIAS CAME UPON US, AND WITH GREAT VIOLENCE TOOK HIM AWAY OUT OF OUR HANDS, COMMANDING HIS ACCUSERS TO COME UNTO THEE; by examining of whom thyself mayest take knowledge of all these things, whereof we accuse him."
Again, all the capital lettered words are omitted in the modern versions.
Acts 28:29 "And when he had said these words, the Jews departed, and had great reasoning among themselves."
Jesus was preached and modern theologians do not want you to know how it affected the Jews because it fulfilled prophecy which they do not believe in.
Romans 16:24 "The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen."
1 John 5:7-8 "For there are three that bear record IN HEAVEN, THE FATHER, THE WORD, AND THE HOLY GHOST: AND THESE THREE ARE ONE. AND THERE ARE THREE THAT BEAR WITNESS IN EARTH, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one." Again, all the capital lettered words are missing in the NASB, NIV, RSV, but are found in the Old Latin manuscripts and in the King James Bible.
If Jesus is not divine then this verse cannot be true and the Trinity does not exist.
The most interesting omission is Mark 16:9-11. It was originally in the Sinaiticus but was removed. How do we know? The page layout of the Sinaiticus is unusual being four columns to a page and this was used only in the period roughly 440-464 AD and the pratice was stopped because it used so much more paper it was deemed too costly. Where Mark 16:9-16 should be there is only three columns so it was not part of the original codex. This is how we know a column was removed which could only be Mark 16:9-21.
The Sinaiticus manuscript of the New Testament given to the world Tischendorf was not the one that was in the monastery.
People who saw the codex before it was removed said it was white. The pages given to King Frederick are white and the pages found late last century are white but the codex Tischendorf gave to the world are aged so it is either not the Sinaiticus or one that has been tampered with. Either way you cannot trust it or use it for Bible translation. Unfortunately there is too much money tied up in it and the Bibles based on it to reveal it is fraudulent.
Everyone who saw it in the monastery said it was white
He pages In Germany are still white
The pages found last century are still white
They would have had to be white when Tischnedorf stole them for the monastery
Yet two months later he showed them to the world and they were aged like they had been stained with tea or coffee. The cold not be the white pages Tischendorf took from the monastery. f they were he had adulterated them in some way so that it could not be the Sinaiticus manuscript that the monastery had.
This means what he showed the world has to have been forged or adulterated in some way.
IT is frightening that this text is a major source for the New Testament Greek given all the errors it has.
The frightening thing is that another manuscript supposedly found in the early 1900’s has been used as an important text in the latest Nestle Aland Greek text has been proved to be a forgery being based on a Greek text that was published in the late 1800’s.
We know because this Greek codex has certain errors no other Greek codex has and this manuscript has these errors.
The results
The emphasis on pleasing God through ritual, sacrifice, results and activity rather than holiness has led to a more worldly church whose objectives are worked out using worldly guidelines and values that other religious use where results are more important than godliness.
Without miracles the church is just another social club with higher values and morals than most.
Without redemption there is no Gospel or need of Jesus dying on the cross.
Without The fall the consequences of sin are removed along with hell and Satan which is other religions do not believe in.
Without a need of Jesus then all other religions can also lead to heaven.
Christianity becomes just another religion fighting for the affiliation of people and which loses to those religions or belief system that has even a small element of the supernatural which is why witchcraft has taken over the lives of many people displacing Christianity as a major force today taking many young people in to its influence and removing them from Christianity.
Closing comments
Without the expression of the authority of Jesus and the work of The Holy Spirit, Christianity is just the like the words of any other religion. There is no archaeological evidence that the resurrection has occurred and that Jesus has the authority over nature and the spirit world that results from it. It might as well be the words of Jehovah's Witnesses, Unitarians or Mormons. In fact there are members of cults on editorial committees of Modern Bibles because there is nothing to show the words of the Bible are little different in content to the words of other holy books.
This is why the supernatural had to be removed from modern Bibles so that it would not be different to the holy books of other religions and show Christ was superior to their founders.
So how does the true Church show it represents Jesus and show how He is different to the founders of other religions?
It expresses the Authority of Jesus over nature and demons
It demonstrates effective spiritual warfare.
How does a person show The Holy Spirit was sent by Jesus and is at work in the world today?
They show The Holy Spirit is relevant and necessary to the Christian life
They are guided by The Holy Spirit so knows how to serve Jesus effectively as well as when to speak to those The Spirit is convicting about the errors of modern theology.
They demonstrate the Gifts of The Holy Spirit in their life.
Where science is concerned there is a need to show science is wrong and The Bible correct but as their a lot of emotionality by scientist who defend evolution and as faith is required to believe in evolution logical arguments will usually get you nowhere even if their scientific theory is shown to be wrong.
Unless the church does these things it will not effectively show modern Bibles are wrong through proving them wrong about what they have said about Jesus and The Holy Spirit. Arguments will only be words by two sides who are convinced they are correct and the other side is wrong.
Unfortunately, instead of learning about these things from Denominations that demonstrate them the established church prefers to criticise them to justify their own position and by this condemn many to a faith that is far less than what it should be, which is to be expected if reason and knowledge is more important than listening to The Holy Spirit and demonstrating The Kingdom of God to the world.
Examine all the changes and you will see it is because they do not believe Jesus is divine, the miracles in The Bible are not true and it is not a good history or science book.
When the church starts to demonstrate the authority of The Kingdom over the world and shows Jesus is God and superior to other religious founders then one will be able to argue against modern bibles by showing Jesus is divine and Lord of all and not just a human who was made divine
An update
In Jerusalem reentlr, a prayer chapel was opnened where Chrisians, Catholics and Muslim worshpped rogether in fellowship. This could only happen is Jesus was not considered diferent to Mohammed. Thius means the time is close for the new world order to reveal its Messiah.